| Publication number | WO1999029169 A1 |
| Publication type | Application |
| Application number | PCT/GB1998/003605 |
| Publication date | 17 Jun 1999 |
| Filing date | 4 Dec 1998 |
| Priority date | 6 Dec 1997 |
| Publication number | PCT/1998/3605, PCT/GB/1998/003605, PCT/GB/1998/03605, PCT/GB/98/003605, PCT/GB/98/03605, PCT/GB1998/003605, PCT/GB1998/03605, PCT/GB1998003605, PCT/GB199803605, PCT/GB98/003605, PCT/GB98/03605, PCT/GB98003605, PCT/GB9803605, WO 1999/029169 A1, WO 1999029169 A1, WO 1999029169A1, WO 9929169 A1, WO 9929169A1, WO-A1-1999029169, WO-A1-9929169, WO1999/029169A1, WO1999029169 A1, WO1999029169A1, WO9929169 A1, WO9929169A1 |
| Inventors | Surendra Durlabh Mistry, Christopher Michael Amey |
| Applicant | Agrevo Uk Limited |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan |
| Patent Citations (7), Non-Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (10), Classifications (6), Legal Events (4) | |
| External Links: Patentscope, Espacenet | |
Title: Pesticidal compositions
Field of the invention
This invention relates to novel pesticide formulations.
One method of applying pesticides to a crop is by means of a seed treatment. As the plant grows it can be protected from the pests which the particular pesticide is used to combat.
Commercially, seeds are treated with the pesticide in seed treatment application equipment in which the pesticide in a formulation is mixed with the seeds. When a formulation is used in which the pesticide is in a particulate form, there is a danger of operator exposure to pesticide dust particles and/or large quantities of pesticide can be lost from the seed as a result of poor adhesion to the seed. Similarly there is risk of operator exposure when the seed treatment equipment is cleaned to remove dried deposit and when the treated seed is drilled in the field.
It is well known that ethylene oxide-propylene oxide block copolymers are used, typically at 1-3%, as dispersants in pesticidal formulations. We have now found that these problems mentioned above can be mitigated by using high levels of ethylene oxide-propylene oxide block copolymer in the pesticide formulation.
Thus, according to the invention, there is provided a pesticide composition for application to a seed, which composition includes at least 5% by weight of an ethylene oxide-propylene oxide block copolymer surfactant.
Although such copolymers have been used in agrochemical formulations, we are not aware that they have been used at such high levels. We have demonstrated that high levels are necessary to obtain the benefits of the invention.
The compositions generally contain from 5% to 30%, preferably 5 to 15%, by weight of an ethylene oxide-propylene oxide block copolymer surfactant.
The invention can be used in conjunction with any pesticide which would be applied as a seed treatment, but is particularly useful for fungicides, insecticides, safeners and agrochemical adjuvants, and especially fungicides. Fungicides that can be included in the compositions of the invention are for example triazoles, such as fluquinconazole, flut afol and triticonazole, and other fungicides, such as carbendazim, prochloraz-copper-chloride complex, tolclofos-methyl, pyhmethanil, carboxin, captan and chlorothalonil. Insecticides that can be incorporated into the composition of the invention include pyrethroids, such as deltamethrin, carbamates such as bendiocarb, and chlorinated hydrocarbons, such as endosulfan. Other compounds include, bronopol, anthraquinone, safeners and various adjuvants.
In the compositions of the invention, the active ingredient is usually in particulate form and includes flowable seed treatments (FS), wettable powders in suspension (WS), dry seed treatments (DS) and micro encapsulated suspension seed treatments (CS). The compositions may also be liquid seed treatments (LS) or emulsions in water (EW).
The compositions usually contain a colouring agent. This is preferably a pigment dispersion which may help improve the stability of the formulation.
The invention is illustrated in the following Examples
Example 1 Seed treatment compositions were formulated by combining the following ingredients
Composition 1
Component g/l
Fluquinconazole technical 167.0 Synperonic PE/F127 (Block copolymer 100.0 of ethylene and propylene oxide)
Acrylic graft copolymer surfactant 6.7
Red pigment dispersion containing propane-1 ,2-diol 47.8
Silicone antifoam 8.0 Monopropylene glycol antifreeze 120.0
Biocide (1 ,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one 2.0 sodium salt in propylene glycol and water)
Xanthan gum 2.5
Water to 1 litre Composition 2
Component g/l
Fluquinconazole technical 167.0
Prochloraz copper(ll) chloride complex technical 34.0 Synperonic PE/F127 (Block copolymer 100.0 of ethylene and propylene oxide)
Acrylic graft copolymer surfactant 8.0
Fatty alcohol ethoxylate surfactant 2.0
Red pigment dispersion containing propane-1 ,2-diol 47.8 Silicone Antifoam 8.0
Monopropylene glycol antifreeze 120.0
Biocide (1 ,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one 2.0 sodium salt in propylene glycol and water)
Xanthan gum 2.5 Water to 1 litre
Both these compositions produced little or no dust when used to treat seeds and thus provided little or no danger of operator exposure.
Example 2
The compositions were tested for their effectiveness for coating seeds
1 kg of wheat seed were treated with the compositions of the invention using a "Rotostat" seed treatment apparatus. The seeds were allowed to dry for 24 hours.
50 g of seed were placed in a 250 ml conical flask. 50 ml isopropanol was added, the flask agitated for 15 seconds and the isopropanol decanted< this extraction procedure was repeated four times and the combined extracts made up to 200 ml with isopropanol. The solution was measured colorimetrically, to give a baseline absorbence.
100 g of treated wheat seed was introduced to a fluidised air bed and mixed for 5 minutes. 50g of these seeds were measured colorimetrically as above to obtain the second absorbence figure. From these two figures the % of adhesion can be calculated according to the following equation: absorbence after mixing x 100 = % adhesion absorbence before mixing From this, the % lost (Dust Off) can be calculated:
For the purposes of comparison the tests were repeated with composition in which the ethylene oxide-propylene oxide block copolymer was used at a low rate or replaced by other surfactants/polymers which are conventionally used to reduce dust levels and improve adhesion to the seed.
The results are shown below
Example 3
Example 2 was repeated except the seed treatment was carried on a commercial scale using a "Roeber" seed treater.
The results are shown below
It will be seen from Examples 2 and 3, low levels of the ethylene oxide-propylene oxide block copolymer surfactant or use of other polymers results in much higher loss of active ingredient from the seeds compared with the compositions of the invention.
Example 4
This example demonstrates the improved flow properties of seed treated with the compositions of the invention according to Example 2.
A polyethylene funnel of standard dimensions (c.1 litre capacity with 45 degree sides and a bottom neck aperture of 18mm) is supported in a retort stand. The bottom is closed and 500 g of seed is added to the funnel, the seed is then allowed to flow through the bottom aperture and the time taken for all the seed to flow out is measured (to 1/100th of a second). The test is repeated twice and the average of the three tests calculated. The results are as follows. For the purposes of comparison, the flow rate of seed treated with composition containing low levels of polymer was also measured as was seed coated with the commercial seed treatment fungicide product "Baytan".
It will be seen that seed treated with the compositions of the invention containing high levels of the ethylene oxide-propylene oxide block copolymer surfactant flows almost as fast as untreated seed (which would be expected to flow fastest since the coating impedes the flow). Further the seed treated according to the invention flows considerably faster than the seed treated with the compositions containing low levels of the ethylene oxide-propylene oxide block copolymer and also much faster than the Baytan treated seeds.
| Cited Patent | Filing date | Publication date | Applicant | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE1542875A1 * | 7 May 1966 | 4 Jun 1970 | Hoechst Ag | Emulgiermittel fuer biocide organische Thiophosphorsaeureester |
| EP0067479A2 * | 7 Jun 1982 | 22 Dec 1982 | Stauffer Chemical Company | N-((trichloromethyl)thio)-4-cyclohexene-1,2-dicarboximide containing composition, a process for treating seeds with said composition, as well as the treated seeds |
| EP0091213A2 * | 10 Mar 1983 | 12 Oct 1983 | FMC Corporation | Pesticidal dry-form seed treater compositions |
| EP0183458A1 * | 18 Nov 1985 | 4 Jun 1986 | Schering Agrochemicals Limited | Fungicidal azole compounds |
| EP0257533A2 * | 19 Aug 1987 | 2 Mar 1988 | Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft | Aqueous fungicidal dispersions |
| EP0697171A1 * | 30 Jun 1995 | 21 Feb 1996 | Rohm And Haas Company | Novel agrochemical suspoemulsion |
| RU2064764C1 * | Title not available |
| Reference | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | * | C. G. UTZ, G. W. DREWNO & R. P. HOLLIS: "Using nonionic surfactants in aqueous formulations", ASTM SPEC. TECH. PUBL., no. 1146, 1993, pages 133 - 144, XP002100289 |
| 2 | * | DATABASE WPI Section Ch Week 9716, Derwent Publications Ltd., London, GB; Class A97, AN 97-177460, XP002100290 |
| Citing Patent | Filing date | Publication date | Applicant | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2005089546A1 * | 15 Mar 2005 | 29 Sep 2005 | Syngenta Participations Ag | Seed treatment pesticidal compositions |
| WO2011028996A3 * | 3 Sep 2010 | 6 Oct 2011 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Anthranilic diamide compositions for propagule coating |
| DE19954401A1 * | 12 Nov 1999 | 6 Dec 2001 | Bayer Ag | Feste Pigmentpräparationen zur Saatgut-/beizeneinfärbung |
| DE19954401C2 * | 12 Nov 1999 | 29 Aug 2002 | Bayer Ag | Feste Pigmentpräparationen zur Saatgut-/beizeneinfärbung |
| US6646023 | 2 Nov 2000 | 11 Nov 2003 | Bayer Aktiengesellschaft | Solid pigment preparation for coloring seed/seed-dressing materials |
| US7696232 | 10 Sep 2002 | 13 Apr 2010 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Anthranilamide arthropodicide treatment |
| US8530382 | 3 Sep 2010 | 10 Sep 2013 | E I Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Anthranilic diamide compositions for propagule coating |
| US8637552 | 10 Aug 2012 | 28 Jan 2014 | E I Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Anthranilamide arthropodicide treatment |
| US9173400 | 27 Jan 2014 | 3 Nov 2015 | E I Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Anthranilamide arthropodicide treatment |
| US9204644 | 19 Dec 2012 | 8 Dec 2015 | E I Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Nanoparticles compositions containing polymers and anthranilic acid diamide insecticides for propagule coating |
| International Classification | A01N43/653, A01N25/24 |
| Cooperative Classification | A01N43/653, A01N25/24 |
| European Classification | A01N43/653, A01N25/24 |
| Date | Code | Event | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Jun 1999 | AK | Designated states | Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AU BR CA CN CZ HU ID IL JP KR MX NZ PL RU TR UA US |
| 17 Jun 1999 | AL | Designated countries for regional patents | Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE |
| 18 Aug 1999 | 121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | |
| 20 Sep 2000 | 122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |